|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Letters - a list
We invite the Lord Chancellor to respond personally and to deal with the facts and challenges our letter of 25 January 2000 covers. His Lordship and his subordinates are only asked to deal with facts and realities no one can run away from. We expect and demand that the undertakings given in the letter we refer to and the multitude of acknowledgements covered in his Lordship's submissions to the House of Commons Select Committee be attended to and that his Lordship deals with our legitimate request / demands. FRAUD is FRAUD and a false instrument, lacking accountability ISSUED AND USED for the sole purpose of pecuniary advantage through abuse of the court's facilities MUST BE TREATED AS THE LAW PROVIDES. Letter to the Lord Chancellor. The letter published below was sent to the Lord Chancellor - not to the Department because of blatant improprieties and misconduct within the confines of a relevant county court. The claims issued and served out of court, for rents not paid to the owners of rented properties were treated with contempt by public servants. All were relying on the use of FORGERIES and False In Law Instruments which the court staff and court officers were issuing in order to justify the dishonest handling of funds belonging to others, through deception in contempt of 'The LAW' (link)
Invitation to the Lord Chancellor to ensure his office calls in to the department a specified case file full of the rampant free for all and misconduct in public office by court staff and judicial chair occupants. The Lord Chancellor and his private office negated to take on board the challenge, presumably because of knowledge of the rampant thefts of the Housing Benefit funds not to mention the misappropriation of funds created through the THREE TIER SYSTEM OF CLAIMS FROM CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND DISTRIBUTION / MISAPPROPRIATION of the differentials in the DSS funds.
The Appeal published at *human-rights* covers the extensive grounds upon which misconduct can be established. The Lord Chancellor and his private office failed to ACT AS REQUESTED. Refer to the first letter sent to the solicitor who negated on his undertakings to the court while anticipating conversion of the agreed, as funds payable to the builder, to attempted legal costs through theatrical productions via incompetently relied upon inexcusable scenarios.
The letter to the Home Secretary jolted the government into action CENSORED E-MAIL ! Violations of Article 10 of the ECoHR We must be doing it right, because they ARE bothered! The ONLY REASON why they intercepted our work / exposures! Read the response from a professor in the USA who received 'the email they tampered with'. Note what he had to say TO THE OFFENDERS and about our work! Violations of our rights, irrespective of the guarantees in and under international law. And such attention simply because WE ARE TELLING THE TRUTH for all to take note of and to act accordingly, from within, WHILE our allegedly well informed electorate is KEPT IN THE DARK by the condescending media and its barons, stooges acting as puppets on the strings of the criminals in control.
The Prime Minister contacted - one of many letters
We ask that you read the closing paragraph of the letter. If you consider the statement to have been sound and worthy of the Prime minister's consideration, consider also the concerns of the author in the rest of the letter and the content of the letter sent to the Home Secretary in December 1998.
Letter to the County Court Clerk. READ THE FACTS RAISED IN THE LETTER and consider the simple compilation, 'The LAW', as published by and at *human-rights*.(link) The letter published below was sent to the person in charge of 'the relevant court and clerical staff'. A similarly disposed to the 'blind deaf and dumb policy/practices person who had been retained at that very court, was moved on, to new pastures, as we discovered later. Our earlier challenges were submitted to the other 'well trained in deceptions on the average citizen. Reference to the attempts in 'The Builder's - case' AFTER the mediation that resulted in the agreed 'CONSENT ORDER' should clarify some of the methods used and the arrangements made by court staff and officers in the course of many a Constructive Fraud through abuse of the court's processes and facilities that are exposed in the *human-rights.org Community On Line* web-sites. The criminal activities covered in the letter were simply instigated, and promoted by 'other public servants who were being tutored in deceptions and used for the dishonest handling of funds belonging to others, as covered at *human-rights*.(link) Public servants trained at and by Haringey Council officers and the legal boffins that Haringey retains to act as alleged 'servants of the public' were relying on the tutored from within the county court and the organisers and promoters of the deceptions and fraud from within the court the recipient was/is managing. The first case published exclusively within these pages at *justice-uk* covers the very elements of the organised disorganisation used by the dishonest in control of Haringey Council, from whence one of their staff/officers had the audacity to write of the reliance they all placed 'on the relevant county court' to endorse and promoted the constructive frauds that public servant invariably are seen to be the instigators of from within local and central government departments.
Letter to the Fraud department of the D.S.S We publish below an explicit letter inviting the Fraud officers at the Department of Social Security to deal with the facts related to them. The offenders could not possibly keep such realities from the public, the electorate, for ever. Read the fair comments as stated in the letter and as pointed to and raised with: - 1. Public servants, the offenders operating from within the confines of Local Authorities. 2. The directors, officers and staff of Letting/Managing Agencies. 3. The Local police INCLUDING the office of Sir Paul Condon (the cover up artist) who received enough communications from at least one targeted couple / victim family the Landlords Action Group was assisting and guiding. 4. Local Authority Councillors. 5. Local and national newspaper editors and reporters who act as stooges dispensing with misinformation, disinformation and planted falsehoods for consumption by the gullible public. 6. Members of Parliament, including the Rt. Hon. Frank Field as soon as he was instructed to think of and do the unthinkable. 7. The great Max Clifford who could get editors interested in the story of the multiple litter gestation in the human-animal. His office and staff reported there was NO INTEREST in the Housing Benefits Multibillion Fraud Industry. The fact that all was/is instigated by public servants FOR THEFT OF FUNDS, through abuse of facilities at their disposal was irrelevant. The Housing Benefit funds SECURED FOR AND BELONGING to third parties, the private landlords letting their homes to the 'needy' was and apparently to this day remains subject to the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS INDUSTRY, as endorsed and promoted by and through our corruption infested Law Enforcement Agencies.
The letter to the Home Secretary covered it all
The letter caused the government to rush in and support Haringey Council with extra funds because of the influx of the refugees to the land of milk and honey. In the process a councillor who contemptuously had been ignoring documented evidence delivered to his colleagues came out of the woods and spoke of the scams and fraud from within the Social Services department as maintained by Haringey Council. The revelations in the local press also exposed the free for all and rampant THREE TIER SYSTEM OF RENT FIXING and Social Security Housing Benefit claims COLLECTED FROM CENTRAL GOVERNMENT for distribution through the devices the creative accountancy experts set in place at Haringey Council as in many other Local Authorities too.
A letter to the Prime Minister We thanked the Prime Minister for recognising the issues we referred to him rested and were founded on CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES. No one could or can ignore such blunt activities, unless party to or accessories to the thefts of funds and the crimes instigated and indulged in, in order to impose thefts of properties, including rights in law denied, as attempted in instances published already and to be published by 'the targeted victims'.
BUT juniors from within the Home Office (acting as placed mischief makers) OVER-RULED our elected Prime Minister. They appear to have acted as all public servants systematically indulge, in our alleged democracy!!! They simply ignored the Prime Minister's directions. They acted in contempt of the Law, all other issues and the rights in law of persons affected by the fraud and corruption. It, therefore, appears that SO LONG AS ULTERIOR MOTIVES ARE SERVED AND UNDECLARED POLICIES ARE IMPOSED ON THE 'serfs' , those who are subjects to the whims of the corrupt and the corrupted do not count and thus DEMOCRACY AND LAW AND ORDER IS SERVED (in accordance with their perverted views, naturally).
More submissions and evidence to follow in support of the concluding words above. |
Copyright belongs to the owners of all material used in these pages.Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners.For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact: webmaster.
|
