 INTRODUCTION
Who?
How?
Why?
CONTRACTS
Why 3?
How?
What for?
SUMMONSES
Why?
Why 3?
Who ?
What for??
Why not all, here?
MEDIATION
Why?
Reasons?
What lead to it?
What for?
Did it End there?
Useful?
CONSENT ORDER
What is it?
How Reached?
End of the Matter?
Enforceable - Ignored
ABDUCTED
JUSTICE For More
Information we take you to our Home Site and you link to Justice Blind
|
|
 The
builder and the Building Contractor Company were introduced to three property development
partners by the management team of well established Estate Agents.
The partners were carrying on business as property developers through a registered
Company. The estate agents had known of and recognised the builder,
and the company he managed, to be reputable and as persons who would not fail to deliver
good workmanship through their workforce.
BECAUSE OF THE MANNER with which the
builders approached the work that was called for and essential for the first contracted
renovation works, the property developers negotiated another two contracts with the
builders, and in fact one of the subsequent contracts was for work to the
residential/family property of one of the partners. SUCH FACTS and realities should be
sufficient PROOF OF THE SOUND AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER WITH WHICH THE BUILDERS DEALT WITH
THEIR CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND UNDERTAKINGS.
Setting aside the fact that payments towards work done,
were not met as agreed and as it progressed, through the solicitor partner who was
in charge of the finances of the property developer partners, the builder accepted and
contracted with the partners for the additional contracts and works. This element alone
establishes there were no grounds and or reasons to 'suspect anything untoward was to
become an element consequential to breaches of contract BY THE PARTNERS.
The above facts and realities are stated here in order that
no misconceptions and or imaginary scenarios, by the experts at perverting and corrupting
'justice', can be asserted and or raised as reliable grounds for arguments in support of
the introduction of the issues that lead to the publication of these pages.
The
background, leading to the institution of court proceedings because of non payment, arose out of contracted and executed building works.
Particulars of the contracts and events leading to the institution of the proceedings are
not published in these pages because those issues, facts and events are not essential for
the purposes of that which we cover in these pages.
What is of essence and paramount
importance is that which took place AFTER an agreement was reached, at Court, with the
parties who defaulted to settle in the first instance. They had failed to meet their
liabilities in accordance with their contractual obligations and they subsequently relied
on the introduction, and submissions at court, of arguments they never raised prior to the
institution of the proceedings. It should be noted that one of the three partners was a
solicitor; a member of the select group who are free to introduce and promote
anything and everything, so long as it generates work for the courts and in the process
creates 'wealth for the parasitic legal circles' care of persons who arise to judicial
chair occupancy from the very legal circles.
The case
stated in these pages covers events that took place after the partners entered into a negotiated settlement following mediation
and a Consent Order was issued and endorsed by the Court; the
agreement was signed by the partners who took part in the court's mediation
facility/service.
Of and to such of the activities, that
take place in our courts, many citizens fall victims
to because of recklessly corrupted legal and court services. They fall prey to the
practices because of the amenable to 'deceit, dishonesty and creation of false
instruments', 'courts and justice administrators' generate, and invariably assert errors
and mistakes. The public suffers from such activities without consideration for the
citizen's stolen and abducted rights, because of use of and promotion for the right to
Appeal from the wrongs of reckless practitioners of thefts of rights. Through the
introduction of false instruments, including BLUNT FORGERIES (as defined by law) many the
scenarios and scripts that lead to theatrical presentations at and within the halls of abducted 'Justice'. Therein, criminal
in intent, false instruments abound and are created by the administrators for the benefit
of the legal circles. The activities leading to 'Appeals and costs creation orders by the
abusers of public office'.
The first contract led to the builders
approaching the partners with matters that arose out of unforeseen problems and weaknesses
in the property under renovation. The estate agents, who were to handle sale and or rental
negotiations, on completion of the contracted works, were consulted by the partners. It
was agreed between the parties that indeed, IF THE PARTNERS WISHED to
progress to sale or rental with unsound and or defective structures and or dressed up
faults, there would arise problems between the property vendors/owners and
buyers/occupiers in any event. In the circumstances additional work was undertaken by the
builder and contracted with the property developers.
Failures,
by the property developers / partners, to meet balances on each of the three contracts,
caused the builder to seek assistance from the Landlords Action Group. He was a member,
and as a property owner with a small portfolio of rented flats he needed for assistance.
He was advised
to issue THREE DEFAULT SUMMONSES, one for each contract, and not to issue one summons for
all three. It was explained to him that should the defaulters introduce any argument about
workmanship there would arise the possibility of holding him and his company to ransom,
until such time as the court dealt with the issues that COULD BE CONCOCTED and introduced
as part and parcel of the usual practices through which 'victims of the dishonest and
deceitful suffer' at and with the courts' judicial chair occupants blessings. The
overriding principle always being that of, "SO LONG AS THERE EXIST OR AVENUES CAN BE CREATED,
THROUGH WHICH TO TIE DOWN ANY APPLICANT TO COURT, THERE SHALL BE NO UNADULTERATED AND
IMPARTIAL 'justice in our courts'. THE COURTS EXIST MERELY AND SIMPLY TO GENERATE INCOME
FOR THE LEGAL CIRCLES".
He was
told that if the defaulting partners introduced alleged breaches on the builder's
part, in all three contracts, consecutive at that, they would be hard pressed to explain
and justify WHY they negotiated successive contracts, IF THE WORKS WERE not as recommended
by the Estate Agents, who introduced the builders. AND if the defaulters were not to
introduce any arguments for all three contracts the Court WOULD be asked to enter
Judgements for and in respect of the contract or contracts the partners would and COULD
NOT ADVANCE or concoct any alleged defence / defences.
IN the circumstances the
builder applied for and secured from court the necessary application forms for all three
claims. |
