Builder's Pages

AGREED LIABILITY
Consent Order Date
Conclusive?
Settlement?
Any Obstacles?

SECOND ORDER?
Why No Settlement?
Another Order?
Why & What for?

WHO RESPONSIBLE?
Court's Part!              What for?
Why?

ANY REMEDY?
What next?
Not as expected!
Other steps taken

The Mediation agreement - CONSENT ORDER - was concluded in the evening of 24th November 1999.  The Order itself was made on 25th November and it was drawn on 8th December 1999 when it was posted to us and to the solicitors acting for the defendants. No payment / remittance had reached by then. The copy of the Order, below, makes clear that ALL THREE claims - cases had been negotiated and that the agreed settlement COVERED ALL THREE CLAIMS. It was/is clearly endorsed with references to ALL THREE cases/claims, as we ensured was recorded in the draft of the agreement before I signed it in the evening of 24th November 1999.

The Consent Order Succinct and clear

Terms, conditions, method of payment and where the payment succinctly and clearly endorsed in the Order. Yet the solicitor, who took part in the negotiations on 24th November 1999, failed to make good his undertakings to the court and to us. NO REMITTANCE was sent to us as he agreed and as succinctly stipulated in the Court Order.

WE soon found out WHY THE SOLICITOR DEFAULTED!  A second Order was drawn on 14 December 1999 and it was posted to us thereafter. This 'second Order' was received by us one day after the Consent Order because it was posted first class. Propositions through this second Order for the need of theatrical scenarios as concocted on the date the order were, to say the least questionable and suspect! What other explanation for the attempted scenario, could there be? You, draw your own conclusions as to WHY it was introduced AFTER the court staff should have recorded the agreed settlement covering ALL THREE CASES/CLAIMS? Unless it be argued, successfully, that our courts are managed by recklessly incompetent illiterates, the logical conclusions arrived at apply in the instance at hand.

You only have to consider WHY THE SOLICITOR failed to remit the agreed liability and you can recognise that the proposed and attempted script/scenario was for theatrical productions through which to generate income for the solicitor who conveniently defaulted to remit and settled as agreed and ordered! The abusers of the legal system within the United Kingdom will have you believe that your imagination is playing games. Needles to say the experts at perverted games and fabrication know best how to switch roles in any screenplay they concoct as they go along!

Reference to the content, the date and WHY it was posted First Class, almost a week after the Consent Order, qualifies and clarifies much. Contacting any solicitor was out of the question, for it was obvious the offending culprits were anticipating on me to take such steps for advise and conversion of the agreed liability to 'legal costs' with another solicitor playing his part in attempted constructive fraud, as proposed through the second Order.  I contacted instead the Landlords Action Group and spoke to the person who assisted me and guided me throughout.

    Second Order - Consider the notes in red

We refer you to other material in these pages. The links in the left column will direct you to other material for clarification as to observations and conclusions drawn out of the indisputable facts attached to the introduction of the second Order at that late stage. Read the fair comment and draw your own conclusions AFTER reading the events that followed the introduction of the above Court Order.

Next Page    Case List of Pages